Your thought are worth reading, but the argument givin doesnt provide text for the bill.flintknapper wrote:The Annoyed Man wrote:
Actually, Texans have not been given a chance to vote on this, either directly, or vicariously through their representatives, because various combinations of Joe Strauss and the B&I committee who both seem to represent business interests very well have repeatedly made sure that The People never get a voice in the matter.
And we're not going to (AGAIN). Did no one anticipate that the bill might be put into B&I (thus insuring its death)? And IF so....wouldn't the time for "calling" have been BEFORE that happened (so maybe it wouldn't)?
The business sector...just handed us or butts (out influenced and maneuvered us). This was/is our best chance at it folks, make the calls (I will) but...I am not holding my breath on this one.
Hopefully, Campus Carry will prevail....so we'll have a bone to chew on for the next two years.
Get on the phone folks!
Flint.
When people cant seem to argue this bill in reference to is text, it is simply hopeless.
Just read the debate thats in this thread. People can even stay on subject.
Debating issues such as Minorities, handicap services, and the constituionality of this bill will get you a lot of attention.
This bill has nothing to do with anything you people bring to debate!
Show me what " Constitutional" Right supports this bill that infringes on private property ownership?
Pro gun or Anti gun, it is necessary to respect the wishes of the property owners. If you dont agree, you have the right to leave.
Your little internet group has no measure against Texas Business.