TexasCHLforum.com

I'd personally be more concerned that the rules to be made under #5 would define seizure as 'any time a LEO comes into possession' rather than the more formal seizure that occurred as part of a shooting incident.

In the second, you'd be more likely to have to get a court order (at least here in H-town) to get your weapon returned anyway after a no-bill. A background check would likely be folded into that lengthy process without much notice (had to watch a co-worker jump through those hoops several years back).

In the first, I could easily see a directive to depts that they update their policy to always disarm whenever encountered (for the officer's safety), check serial number and verify NICS (by either the officer or someone back at the dept) before returning being added to the process of a stop.

But that just my normal pessimism speaking. (I'd be more than happy to be proven wrong, just not going to get my hopes up)