Pointing to Federal Law is not an admission of concurrence or support for said law, just an acknowledgment that the law exists, is enforceable and will land you in the pokey if you get busted in violation.steveincowtown wrote:Also, is seems really strange to me that so many folks the believe the Feds should be limited, automatically point to "because the Feds say so" when it comes to medical Marijuana. Isn't the the restriction of this drug or any other really something that should be decided on the state level anyhow?
State level drug regulation is debatable.... Drugs are quite clearly involved in many issues regulated under Federal authority including but not limited to interstate commerce (a widely abused Federal Power, perhaps the most widely abused)...
The Second Amendment, however, is not.
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
States do not have the right to infringe on the Bill of Rights. But what do I know?
