Excaliber wrote:Starting with the assumption that the facts have been accurately stated here, I have strong doubts that dogs are what those excited individuals were concerned about having photographed.Abraham wrote:I agree with Rotor - sounds like a dubious story.
The OP may have inadvertently taken a picture of illegal activity, or a place where such activity often takes place.
oooo, interesting thought....OP should take a real close look at those pics.