Charles, I'm sorry if my use of the word "fairly" irritated you. I've been one of the biggest proponent Dr Donna has had.Charles L. Cotton wrote:No, she hasn't been a "fairly strong voice for gun owners." She's been rock solid and worked as hard for us as anyone. I don't know anything about the homeschool issue and Sen. Campbell, but they won't cost her election nor block any of her gun bills. (I'm a strong supporter of homeschooling.)SewTexas wrote:Charles L. Cotton wrote:I disagree on almost all points. The vast majority of unenforceable signs came down, not just a few as you claim. Yes, CP-108 is a problem, but only for locations were private persons or entities control government property. This is easily fixed as is the problem with so-called "educational institutions" and "amusement parks" on governmental property like zoos and libraries.
Rotor, you are correct about Sen. Estes. He's one of the strongest voices for Texas gun owners and a true champion of the Second Amendment. However, when a law need tweaking, you first go to the primary sponsor in the House or Senate, whichever version of the bill passed. This would be Sen. Donna Campbell (SB273), another strong voice for gun owners.
Fines-for-signs is not dead or even on its death bed. It has a minor cold that can be fixed.
Chas.
she's been a fairly strong voice for gun owners, yes. But right now she's got homeschoolers out for her throat, some are starting to question her conservatism.
Chas.
Right now, however, she's on the wrong side of a school choice bill she's working on and she's got homeschoolers all over the state angry. And yes, they can cost her the election if they choose to, I've seen it happen.
Oh, and most homeschoolers, are pro-2nd.