I think you're right, and I was not making my point clear enough. What I was trying to say was that if a property owner does not want CHL holders on their property then they have a RIGHT to post a complaint sign, and I have the RIGHT under the law to ignore the non complaint ones.Top
Re: "gunbuster" signs, trespassing, etc.
by 74novaman » Mon Apr 25, 2011 8:50 am
I think you missed his point, LL. To the OP, if you feel like their property rights supersede your defense rights, thats fine. You can treat gunbusters signs as if they were proper postings and choose not to carry there, or not enter. No one says you can't go above and beyond the law, if you feel that strongly about property rights.
The Texas 30.06 is great. If people really do want to forbid lawful carry on their property, they have a legal means to do so. If it doesn't concern them enough to look up the law and they post the generic gun busters, they obviously don't care that much, so neither do I.
Search found 2 matches
Return to “"gunbuster" signs, trespassing, etc.”
- Mon Apr 25, 2011 9:52 am
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: "gunbuster" signs, trespassing, etc.
- Replies: 67
- Views: 6601
Re: "gunbuster" signs, trespassing, etc.
- Mon Apr 25, 2011 9:47 am
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: "gunbuster" signs, trespassing, etc.
- Replies: 67
- Views: 6601
Re: "gunbuster" signs, trespassing, etc.
First concealed means concealed, so it should not come up in the first place. Second they do have a right to keep you out of their business while carrying by simply posting a 30.06 sign. I see gunbuster signs all the time, and I just walk on past if they really wanted to keep weapons out they can put up the correct sign if not its not your problem. If you are "made" and giving a verbal 30.06 notice then I would leave and not return because if you dont want my weapon in here then you dont want me in here .