So did they say in what ways he could legally purchase a handgun?Jasonw560 wrote:Did a little checking, and the "Brady Bunch" pulled the amicus brief. Seems it was all over the place like an ADD kid in a toy store. The funny thing is, they then filed the exact same brief in a lawsuit in Noo Yawk.
Now, The ATF wants to throw out the lawsuit because the ATF claims that D'cruz is only forbidden from buying a gun from a federally-licensed gun dealer. Further, D'cruz is "free to obtain handguns in a variety of legal ways and from a variety of legal sources." (As of December 23rd)
Really?
Can't wait to see what the judge does. Trying to find the case on the court web site, but it's not available.
Search found 3 matches
Return to “Lubbock Federal Court to hear handguns for 18-20 year olds.”
- Thu Jan 06, 2011 10:26 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Lubbock Federal Court to hear handguns for 18-20 year olds.
- Replies: 92
- Views: 15077
Re: Lubbock Federal Court to hear handguns for 18-20 year ol
- Sun Dec 12, 2010 2:15 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Lubbock Federal Court to hear handguns for 18-20 year olds.
- Replies: 92
- Views: 15077
Re: Lubbock Federal Court to hear handguns for 18-20 year ol
Yes and No. A person 12 years of age can draw Social Security, but at the age of 12 they are not eligible to retire. This is Federal not ConstitutionalHoi Polloi wrote:How would social security retirement work then? It creates a special class of privileges by age.MeMelYup wrote:Maybe we need a Constitutional amendment stating, "Upon attaining the age of majority a person may not be restricted of any rights and privileges as a citizen due to age".WildBill wrote:Regardless of age, those serving in the military should have all of the rights and privileges of a U.S. citizen.Zoomie wrote:Lets try and get rights for those of us under 21 and those of us serving in the military.
The age that was in question was pertaining to the 2nd amendment, which is the age of majority.
The BATF passed the law stating that a person under 21 could not buy a handgun or handgun ammunition. This is of Federal jurisdiction and usurps the authority of the 2nd amendment.
I will even go farther and guess that due to the BATF requirement to be 21 is why Texas Concealed Carry is written the way it is and has a loophole for the Military.
That’s my opinion and you know what they say about that.
- Sun Dec 12, 2010 12:33 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Lubbock Federal Court to hear handguns for 18-20 year olds.
- Replies: 92
- Views: 15077
Re: Lubbock Federal Court to hear handguns for 18-20 year ol
Maybe we need a Constitutional amendment stating, "Upon attaining the age of majority a person may not be restricted of any rights and privileges as a citizen due to age".WildBill wrote:Regardless of age, those serving in the military should have all of the rights and privileges of a U.S. citizen.Zoomie wrote:Lets try and get rights for those of us under 21 and those of us serving in the military.