Return to “Utah Problem - SOLVED”
The so-called "loophole in the Texas CHL law" is also an option, at least for now, it's comparable to the "gunshow loophole" so often parroted by anti-2nd types - ie: private sales without NICS.Charles L. Cotton wrote:Both options are in the IRS Code, so that's not a loophole. You're going to have to try harder to make yet another snide comment. It will probably be your last, by the way.
Chas.
"Couldn't qualify" as in how/what way?The Annoyed Man wrote:Please. I'm a businessman. With all due respect, those instructors in question were not "good businessmen." They were the same kind of parasite as ambulance chasing attorneys. You can call that "good business" if you want. I call it exploiting loopholes in the law to get CHLs for people who mostly, but not all, couldn't qualify for a CHL. I call it sleaze.
That would be fine by me, works very well in Vermont.ELB wrote:The whole CHL idea itself should be dispensed with; it is tolerable only in that it represents a step forward from where we used to be. It is not a desireable endstate. Any adult of the US who does not have a feloniously violent criminal history or is not certifiably looney should be able to defend himself with whatever he chooses tote along.
