No the question posed to me was specifically about a woman slapping a man. I answered that I believe in equal rights for all. I don't believe in discriminating against women due to their sex.C-dub wrote:The laws may be specific regarding a man slapping a woman, but I doubt it. The question at this point in this discussion is whether or not you think a slap deserves a permanent deferral.clarionite wrote:I don't see it any different than any other adult slapping another adult.ScottDLS wrote:do you consider such "slapping" a felony that should permanently ban a woman from owning a gun?clarionite wrote:I'm no more OK with a woman slapping a man than I am with a man slapping a woman. Neither are appropriate in my book.ScottDLS wrote: I'm 100% with you on this, We've got class c misdemeanants with lifetime federal firearms ban. The Federal "domestic violence" definition is very loose. I think that states could define it "out" of the federal prohibition, maybe.... And also know that there is no clear way to identify "DV" in the federal system. Especially problematic is the woman ('cause it's always a woman, right??) who copped to a class c or b before Sen Lautenberg's law, for shoving her husband. And the female that "slapped" her intimate partner for making a sexist remark...
Why is it different?
To answer your latest question, I believe in looking at the entire situation. If a man hits a woman, he's shown a lack of respect for her and her well being. I believe it calls for at least a temporary suspension of his rights to carry. Quite possibly more. If a woman hits a man, she's also shown a lack of respect for him and his well being. Why should she be treated any differently?