Huh... works for me. And your reasoning is obvious enough that I should've thought of it on my own.Charles L. Cotton wrote:Churches do have a unique need for this legislation that no other non-profit experiences. (The bill also applies to schools.) No other non-profit organization tends to have a large number of people gathered in one location on a regular basis, thus making the planning and attack by a mass murdered easier. Churches are targeted specifically because they are places of worship.Dave2 wrote:I didn't pick that one because I don't see what makes churches special in this regard. I'd either make the exception for all non-profits in general, or not for anybody (not sure which).android wrote:I don't even go to church and I picked that one. I have read about the issue and I think it's a burdensome restriction.RPBrown wrote:With all of the lengthy discussions here about church carry and security teams, I am surprised to see the number for that so low.
Very few churches post 30.06 signs and many tens of thousands of CHLs carry handguns in church every Sunday, as well as other days. Texas law allows people to defend themselves and others and there is no doubt that many CHLs will respond to a violent attack in their churches. Being able to form a volunteer security team and educate/coordinate with fellow armed church members will increase overall safety.
Chas.
Search found 2 matches
Return to “Critical legislation for 2015”
- Wed Jun 25, 2014 11:33 pm
- Forum: 2015 Legislative Session
- Topic: Critical legislation for 2015
- Replies: 206
- Views: 37797
Re: Critical legislation for 2015
- Wed Jun 25, 2014 9:28 pm
- Forum: 2015 Legislative Session
- Topic: Critical legislation for 2015
- Replies: 206
- Views: 37797
Re: Critical legislation for 2015
I didn't pick that one because I don't see what makes churches special in this regard. I'd either make the exception for all non-profits in general, or not for anybody (not sure which).android wrote:I don't even go to church and I picked that one. I have read about the issue and I think it's a burdensome restriction.RPBrown wrote:With all of the lengthy discussions here about church carry and security teams, I am surprised to see the number for that so low.