In other words, Massachusetts already has the equivalent of "Universal Background Checks" because everyone must get a license before they can possess a handgun and all transfers must go through an FFL. Yet these mass-bomber serial killers were willing to ignore existing federal and Massachusetts firearm background check, licensing and purchase laws. Lot of good any new "feel good" laws would have done. SHOCKER!In short, put a sock in it Bloomberg -- this is a knowing and intentional fraud your "news organization" is running upon the public:
The reason they're not saying how they got the guns is that there was no legal way for them to do so.Bloomberg wrote:Boston bomber Tamerlan Tsarnaev’s name on a U.S. government travel-watch list should have kept him from boarding an airplane without some scrutiny, yet he could purchase semi-automatic handguns with none.
Local and federal law enforcement officials either don’t know or aren’t yet saying how Tsarnaev and his brother, accused of bombing the Boston Marathon, obtained the guns they later used to kill a university police officer and critically injure a mass-transit officer. They didn’t apply for Massachusetts gun permits, as required by state law.
Here's the reality folks -- while it is legal for a resident of one state to cross a state line and buy a rifle in another, provided the laws of both states are complied with, it is not legal for a person to obtain a handgun in any state other than the one in which one resides.
....
The reason the question hasn't been answered is that there was no lawful way for a person to sell or otherwise transfer to these people the handguns, as they required a license to acquire them in Massachusetts and it is flatly unlawful to transfer a handgun, whether by a dealer or private party, where the buyer and seller do not reside in the same state.
As such there was no lawful means by which anyone could have transferred the handguns to these two and there was also no lawful means by which they could have bought them, since they didn't have the required permits.
Search found 2 matches
Return to “Boston bombing suspects did not have valid handgun licenses”
- Wed Apr 24, 2013 6:39 am
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Boston bombing suspects did not have valid handgun licenses
- Replies: 25
- Views: 3289
More 2nd Amendment Lies
Here is a succinct statement from an unlikely source: More 2nd Amendment Lies.
- Mon Apr 22, 2013 11:58 am
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Boston bombing suspects did not have valid handgun licenses
- Replies: 25
- Views: 3289
Re: Boston bombing suspects did not have valid handgun licen
When they do a firearms trace, how would you like to be the last owner in the chain that they can trace?