I have not personally seen the list. But From the NRA ILA
and my contact in Virginia that is what I was told. I also
understand she will introduce the bill on the 22nd of January.
Search found 2 matches
Return to “Potentially Banned Weapons on the coming Feinstein Bill ?”
- Mon Jan 07, 2013 5:43 pm
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: Potentially Banned Weapons on the coming Feinstein Bill ?
- Replies: 33
- Views: 4582
- Mon Jan 07, 2013 12:00 am
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: Potentially Banned Weapons on the coming Feinstein Bill ?
- Replies: 33
- Views: 4582
Re: Potentially Banned Weapons on the coming Feinstein Bill
Feinstein’s proposal is a bad deal. I think if they pass this it will sound like they just want the magazines that hold more than ten rounds. When implemented, it will be understood to be any firearm that will accept a magazine over ten rounds. It also, AIUI, says anything forward of the action will be considered as an add-on; few firearms do not have a magazine well in front of the action. If a gun is magazine fed it can accept a magazine over ten rounds therefore the gun will be banned. When instituted banned will read prohibited.
By the way she says there will be over 900 approved guns. On that list of 900 approved guns there are zero handguns of any type.
We cannot wait. I have already contacted my representatives to say I am not in favor
of any additional gun control. I have taken to challenging in a calm and sincere way any one when they say things I know to be false in a conversation which I am involved. Emotion aside, a minuscule percentage of what they have to say is based in truth or facts. Unfortunately the press, for the most part, is on the wrong side.
We must not allow untruths and even innuendo to go unchallenged.
Full disclosure, as I read the last sentence I do not mean anybody on
this forum.
My o2
By the way she says there will be over 900 approved guns. On that list of 900 approved guns there are zero handguns of any type.
We cannot wait. I have already contacted my representatives to say I am not in favor
of any additional gun control. I have taken to challenging in a calm and sincere way any one when they say things I know to be false in a conversation which I am involved. Emotion aside, a minuscule percentage of what they have to say is based in truth or facts. Unfortunately the press, for the most part, is on the wrong side.
We must not allow untruths and even innuendo to go unchallenged.
Full disclosure, as I read the last sentence I do not mean anybody on
this forum.
My o2