TexasCHLforum.com

philip964 wrote: ↑Sat Dec 12, 2020 3:02 pm https://apple.news/ANW2-QEALSUSylbnJfrggZA

USAToday tells us why we lost, Court was conservative, they don’t make stuff up.

philip964 wrote: ↑Sat Dec 12, 2020 1:19 pm https://news.yahoo.com/constitution-ans ... 01597.html

Constitution answer for seditious members congress.

More of that bring us back together.

Soccerdad1995 wrote: ↑Sat Dec 12, 2020 12:54 pm So the Supreme court has refused to hear a dispute between the states regarding the legitimacy of the Presidential election. They apparently would prefer to have this remain as an open dispute with over 1/3 of the states openly disputing the validity of the electors necessary to anoint Biden as President.

Can there be a more impactful dispute between states than who should be leading the Executive branch?

I guess if a group of states decides to secede and the rest of the states say they cannot, then SCOTUS will also decide that they can't be bothered and would rather let the states just handle it themselves?

philip964 wrote: ↑Wed Dec 09, 2020 4:28 pm

parabelum wrote: ↑Wed Dec 09, 2020 1:31 pm I really hope and pray that I’m wrong, but I don’t see SCOTUS taking this or any cases apparently related to the fraud and abuse of the election system because they threw out the PA case. Even more troubling, not ONE justice has written a dissent. Not one of them, even the ones we think of staunch conservatives. Very troubling. They don’t want to get near any of it.

Hannidy and o’Riley, both seem to think SCOTUS will pass.
O’Riley wants a special prosecutor appointed by Barr to investigate the election.

gtolbert09 wrote: ↑Tue Dec 08, 2020 9:26 pm Apparently Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, and South Dakota have joined Texas in the lawsuit.

philip964 wrote: ↑Tue Dec 08, 2020 1:52 pm https://news.yahoo.com/texas-asks-u-sup ... 30191.html

Reuters view on it.