The Annoyed Man wrote:stroguy wrote:That basically makes Paulie an agent of Obama if he doesn't throw his support for the Republican.
The problem is that Ron Paul won't do that. He never has in the past, and if he's true to form, he won't this time either. He's not a party stalwart. He
uses the party to leverage his campaign resources, but he doesn't give a cup of warm spit about it. Therefore, his disciples will do what they always do, and if Ron Paul does't endorse the nominee they will help Obama to a win. If I were the party chair, I would be sitting down with Ron Paul come late October and let him know in no uncertain terms that if he does not endorse the Republican candidate (if it isn't him), he will no longer have access to party resources going forward and his party membership will be terminated.
Do you really think Ron Paul will care about Republican support after this campaign season? He is retiring from Congress next year. I think his real goal is to gather delegates and have some influence at the convention We are voting for more than a presidential nominee when we vote in the primarys.. in fact technically we aren't really voting for a nominee, but for a slate of delegates. I think Ron Paul hopes to shift the Republican platform more libertarian .. and this will be his last stand, and will pass his libertarian scepter to his his son. I think that he might find that either Mittens or the Grinch might be open to some of his influences, such as laying off a social agenda, shrinking government, and even getting out of Afghanistan.
While I don't like Ron Paul as a candidate, and believe he is embarassing to the libertarian cause. I want mittens and the grinch to duke it out. It helps hilite the differences so that we can decide who is best, Its better reality tv than Snooky, and there is plenty of time for them to kiss and make up before the general election.