We have cops who apparently aren't shy about using blackmail to get a a couple of guns. Would such corrupt officers be above lying about the guns being unconcealed, if it meant covering their behinds.dihappy wrote:This about sucks :(
Its too bad he didnt know his rights better and refused, or stated, that he did not give consent to search.
The cops must have given him the "you dont mind if i search do you?" line.
Its a shame that a crooked, or poorly educated cop, can just break the law in an instant, arrest you, but then it costs YOU thousands to either prove you werent guilty, or get your property returned.
Search found 2 matches
Return to “Not a Good LEO Encounter”
- Mon Apr 27, 2009 8:07 pm
- Forum: LEO Contacts & Bloopers
- Topic: Not a Good LEO Encounter
- Replies: 118
- Views: 29610
Re: Not a Good LEO Encounter
- Mon Apr 27, 2009 8:01 pm
- Forum: LEO Contacts & Bloopers
- Topic: Not a Good LEO Encounter
- Replies: 118
- Views: 29610
Re: Not a Good LEO Encounter
Why do police/sheriff departments put provisos like this on these deals? Why not simply return them? What do they have to gain?
[/quote]
Ahmm? isn't it obvious? They have the guns to gain.
[/quote]
Ahmm? isn't it obvious? They have the guns to gain.