howdy wrote:I remember at my last instructor requal, the DPS attorney said zero tolerance. Her take was a person with one beer/drink is "impaired" in relation to that same person without that one beer/drink. Impairment "however so slight" is impairment. I'm just the messenger here. Her comment provoked a lively discussion among the instructors. This particular attorney taught the law at my instructors class and she has been at all three of my recalls. I am going to requal in August so I will ask her opinion again. She strikes me as being anti CHL even though she deals with it professionally.
Its not the first time this has been stated, and off forum the complaints are even louder. One has wonder ,"Why she has that job?"