Search found 2 matches

by Liberty
Thu Sep 27, 2007 7:58 pm
Forum: New to CHL?
Topic: No gun company policy and 30.06 sign
Replies: 58
Views: 8671

Sangiovese wrote: THIS is something that I have a serious problem with. I hate the fact that companies think that a policy about weapons makes them less liable if something happens.

In my opinion, the company becomes MORE liable if they disarm a legally armed citizen. By disarming me and removing my ability to protect myself, they have taken on complete responsibility for my safety.

If I am at work and am not carrying because of the company policy and something happens and I am injured in a situation where I would have been able to defend myself... you can bet yer booties that I will be suing them for failing to protect me after they denied me my legal right to protect myself.

My company policy also prohibits weapons stored in cars - preventing me from carrying during my commute. If I were to obey this foolish requirement and have an incident occur during my commute - I would be suing them for denying me my right to defend myself during my commute.

If this happened a few times, employers would realize that banning all guns is not some miracle cure for lawsuits... and they might stop making these ridiculous policies.
The truth is I don't believe anyone has successfully sued because they were forced to be unarmed.
by Liberty
Mon Sep 17, 2007 12:15 pm
Forum: New to CHL?
Topic: No gun company policy and 30.06 sign
Replies: 58
Views: 8671

barres wrote:
TC-TX wrote:
seamusTX wrote:When this topic has been discussed in the past in this forum, the consensus was that any oral (spoken) warning was sufficient to make you liable to 30.06 prosecution, and written notice had to conform to 30.06. It doesn't need to be a sign. It could be the company policy manual or a web site.

The company that I work for has orientation where someone talks through the policy manual, and I specifically recall them mentioning the no weapons policy, although the written policy does not conform to 30.06.

In any case, they're unlikely to prosecute you if you're caught. Few companies want the publicity. They're more likely to persuade you to quit.

- jim
Written notification - in an Employer/Employee relationship does NOT have to comply with PC 30.06 requirements for either Printed or Posted notification.

No special Words, No special requirements. ANYTHING GOES.
Only in terms of whether or not you could/would be fired. Written notification must meet PC30.06 requirements for prosecution.

Return to “No gun company policy and 30.06 sign”