shootthesheet wrote:It is not my responsibility to give up my rights so someone else can feel better. It is their responsibility to voice their concerns and not mine to volunteer information to them. I look at it like the posting law for CHL holders. If a person is anti-freedom they have the responsibility to let it be known and I will respect their wishes. Otherwise they have no objections.
Keeping and bearing arms is a right equal to any other and it is time we make that part of our thought process and do away with the lies we have been conditioned to believe. Our social responsibilities end at safety. As long as we are safe and obey the laws we have done all that is necessary to exercise our rights as civilized people. It is not necessary to deny ourselves our God given rights for some very false belief that not to do so would be somehow disrespectful or would in any way deny someone else of their rights. That goes for everyone to include a parent who has a choice to let their kids be around me or not.
If your *only* concern is whether or not you are following the letter of the law - then you indeed have no obligation to consider the question of parental sovereignty as it applies to your decisions (even legal ones) while around other peoples children. If, on the other hand a strained or broken relationship between you, your children, and another family is something that might trouble you; then you should at least consider the various possible outcomes of that decision. Once you have weighed the possible outcomes, you may and probably will, still feel like you are making the best decision for your situation. But in the face of that decision - you still should be prepared for all possible outcomes:
The Good:
Charles L. Cotton wrote:I work with our student ministry at First Baptist Church - Friendswood so I'm carrying around a lot of kids. I can't say that every parent knows I'm carrying, but unless they are brand new to our church, I can't imagine there is one that doesn't know. I've never had a single one complain, even from people who I know are afraid of guns. On the other hand, I've had a lot of parents tell me they're glad I'm there and some are especially grateful when we go on field trips.
Our "small group" program meets in the homes of people who volunteer their homes for our meetings. I carry in all of them also. Again, everyone knows it because it's common knowledge that "if you see Cotton, he's carrying." I don't talk about it; I don't ask permission, I just wear my gun like my watch -- I never think about it.
If someone were to tell me they didn't want me carrying my gun when their kid was with me, then I'm afraid I'd just have to invite them to take their kid to the movies while the rest of us did something else. It's certainly the parents' right, but I won't disarm and leave myself and the kids parents expect me to protect defenseless.
Chas.
and the bad:
Hoi Polloi wrote:I know of an anti-gun family finding out that a CHL mom was carrying when around their kids and it wasn't pretty. I think what you do to lesson their concerns depends on how much you value the relationship. Definitely make it clear to your kids that it isn't a topic that we discuss with others. I have a huge issue with asking kids to keep a "secret" so I explain the difference between privacy and secrecy and I tell them that this is a private matter when something like that comes up. I then use the opportunity to go over what they should do if an adult ever asks them to keep a secret.
However, I also have some issues with my kids being around gun owners who aren't as careful as I think they should be. I am particularly concerned about guns that are in purses that are left unattended, inside car holsters that aren't locked, in the master bedroom nightstand drawer when kids are in and out of the bedroom, or other easily accessible places. I teach them gun safety, but it seems like an inordinate risk to take and I do limit their activities around those I don't think are careful enough with guns when children are around.
As I parent, there are some CHL holders that I am sure - do not adhere to my standards of weapon handling. As long as they leave it alone - it shouldn't be a problem and perhaps I am better off if I don't know. But you can't escape the fact that weapons are powerful tools. Not everyone will feel the same about them.
The concepts of parental sovereignty and misplaced trust doesn't just apply to weapons. My co-worker relayed a story about how his daughter was invited to spend the night with a neighborhood kid. They knew the family fairly well - about as well as you would know any neighborhood family. They took her out to eat that night and were somewhat shocked the next day to find that they went to eat at Hooters. Now many of you many not find that to be a big deal - the other family obviously didn't. But to my co-worker, while not a strip-club or anything, Hooters would certainly not be on his list of family restaurants. It wasn't the end of the world, but clearly shows how different perceptions can be from one family to the next.
To so quickly dismiss the concerns that a parent may have over their child being in the presence of a weapon strictly on the basis of legal rights and your own opinion over which condition (armed vs unarmed) is safer - does not seem wise to me. Perhaps the other parent has indeed "been conditioned to believe" something that is not true. But that will not change overnight and they are only attempting to act, and make decisions, in the best interest of their child. We should at least give that position a little thought and respect before dismissing it out of hand.
[Edited to correct some grammatical errors - terryg]