TexasCHLforum.com

Jumping Frog wrote:

speedsix wrote:...I don't think this is "entire and uncut"...

That's the way he was describing it on the radio. I didn't bother watching.

I watched it....it was only about 2.5 minutes...not uncut. It couldn't have helped his defense because it was an obvious attempt to stage a justification for shooting someone. He kept repeating "my life is in danger" and "I'm standing my ground," like they are magical incantations. There was no fear or concern in his voice whatsoever --and while he kept saying his life was in danger: 1) the tape didn't indicate any danger --no one was approaching him when he was saying this; and 2) if he was afraid, all he had to do was go back into his house. That said, the neighbors having the party sounded like a bunch of jerks.

Heartland Patriot wrote:Does anyone know anything about State Judge David Mendoza? I'm curious if this will be adjudicated fairly on the ACTUAL events that occurred (and if the dude with the CHL gets convicted of murder, so be it, as long as it is done properly according to the LAW)...OR if this will be turned into some liberal gun and CHL bashing press propaganda moment. It seems as if the antis are running a full agenda to get the USEFULNESS of the CHL to be limited since they have been unable to get their dream of a "gun-free utopia" enacted. I want everyone to understand that I didn't always believe in "conspiracies" and tin-foil hattery but the way the "mainstream media" operates in this nation today, well...

Most of the time when people are calling something a "conspiracy theory" it is just a method of ridicule used to suppress debate. But no conspiracy theory need be advanced to explain the behavior of the MSM. Is it a "conspiracy" that most of the Democrats who voted in the last presidential election voted for Obama? Did they get orders from the top conspirators to go out and vote for Obama? No, they became Democrats because they believe people like Obama share their political vision, or at least, do so more than the other alternative. The MSM is mostly made up of left-wing political activists who joined because they see media positions as a means of advancing their agendas; and since they mostly share the same political "vision" and agenda, especially on key issues like gun control, they cast their "votes" for that agenda whenever the opportunity arises, just like Democrats vote Democratic, and Republicans vote Republican.

It's obvious that the MSM operates in unison on many issues, including gun control and support for The One, and to pretend otherwise is bordering on the delusional. No orchestration is necessary for this to happen --though I do think there is some degree of orchestration via the Obama administration, especially in their political coverage, but I don't think it comes in the form of orders being passed down from the top, but more in the form of "editorial expression." More like a dog trying to please his master than a soldier carrying out his orders.