Clearly does not conform to the 30.06 statute. 46.035 (i) would be your defense.
However, I would say the property owner's message is clear. One way to avoid any problems……KEEP IT CONCEALED! If you keep it concealed, you should never have an issue.
Search found 3 matches
Return to “Signs for the CHLer”
- Fri Jul 30, 2010 11:13 pm
- Forum: New to CHL?
- Topic: Signs for the CHLer
- Replies: 323
- Views: 155486
- Fri Jun 25, 2010 6:35 am
- Forum: New to CHL?
- Topic: Signs for the CHLer
- Replies: 323
- Views: 155486
Re: Signs for the CHLer
I agree one hundred percent!jester wrote:You can beat the ride if you obey the law and keep it concealed.Justin CHL wrote:Totally agree! You may beat the rap, but you're not gonna beat the ride!
- Thu Jun 24, 2010 7:22 am
- Forum: New to CHL?
- Topic: Signs for the CHLer
- Replies: 323
- Views: 155486
Re: Signs for the CHLer
Totally agree! You may beat the rap, but you're not gonna beat the ride! However, if you are willing to go to court and establish "case law" for the rest of us, I will recommend a good attorney.joe817 wrote:UpTheIrons, IMO no. The contrasting colors does not necessarily define the sign as non compliant....
The wording of the sign does. "Article 4413 (29ee)" is not in the current Statutes...therefore obsolete and not enforceable.
Yes...you CAN be arrested and be handcuffed and be taken in a police car to the jail, photographed, booked and processed in, but if you have an attorney(with money spent) you will get the case dismissed.....if you want to go that route.
{all of the above assumes you wish to conceal carry past that sign}