bmwrdr wrote:crazy2medic wrote:Shooting him in the leg? So was he aiming for center mass and that is where he just happened to hit him?
Most police and military is trained to aim for the legs to disable if the aggressor is just lightly armed. The goal is to disable the suspect.
They are also not allowed to use hollow point ammo, FMJ only in accordance to the Geneva conventions.
Sounds crazy but that's what it is over there.
The suspect in this case targeted woman to have an easy target. I wish they would have been armed and teach the coward a lesson.
http://www.nydailynews.com/newswires/ne ... -1.3424561
I borrowed this from another forum because it explains far better than I can:
The US military is not presently using hollow points in conventional force units. The US Army is considering by testing the use of Hollow Points in their new sidearm. It is understood when under NATO treaties, NATO countries will abide by Hague Convention of 1899. The US is one of major powers that did not agree to this portion of Hague Conventions. see below
The Hague Convention of 1899, Declaration III, prohibited the use in international warfare of bullets that easily expand or flatten in the body.[3] This is often incorrectly believed to be prohibited in the Geneva Conventions, but it significantly predates those conventions, and is in fact a continuance of the St. Petersburg Declaration of 1868, which banned exploding projectiles of less than 400 grams, as well as weapons designed to aggravate injured soldiers or make their death inevitable. NATO members do not use small arms ammunition that are prohibited by the Hague Convention and the United Nations.
The United States is one of few major powers that did not agree to IV,3 of the Hague Convention of 1899, thus able to use this kind of ammunition in warfare. The US Army has mentioned that they consider using the ammunition for stock sidearms, plans set in 2018.