Search found 2 matches

by stash
Sun Dec 05, 2010 9:26 am
Forum: 2011 Texas Legislative Session
Topic: Licensed open-carry or unlicensed open-carry?
Replies: 75
Views: 12412

Re: Licensed open-carry or unlicensed open-carry?

Oldgringo wrote:
anygunanywhere wrote:
stash wrote:I support OC if for no other reason the problem with printing/unintentional failure to conceal problem that we have seen here in the past. I assume OC would eliminate these possible problems.

Oops - I think CHL should be required for OC as opposed to no license.
Neither printing nor unintentional faillure to conceal are offenses under state law. How can they be a problem if they are not illegal?

Anygunanywhere
:headscratch You reckon that the problem might lie in convincing the LEO AND the judge that the exposures weren't intentional?
Yeppers - I know they are not illegal but If I remember correctly, someone here (can't remember his screen name) this past summer had problems with the law when he had an unintentional failure to conceal.

On second thought, maybe it does not happen often enough to be concerned about.

Stan
by stash
Sat Dec 04, 2010 9:57 am
Forum: 2011 Texas Legislative Session
Topic: Licensed open-carry or unlicensed open-carry?
Replies: 75
Views: 12412

Re: Licensed open-carry or unlicensed open-carry?

I support OC if for no other reason the problem with printing/unintentional failure to conceal problem that we have seen here in the past. I assume OC would eliminate these possible problems.

Oops - I think CHL should be required for OC as opposed to no license.

Return to “Licensed open-carry or unlicensed open-carry?”