TexasCHLforum.com

Bait and switch? Its not like he was enticing the aggressor.

When I first read these two SD storys (the crazy guy beating on a car) I thought for sure the CHL guys were going to have a black eye and antis would be moving in for the kill.

It just goes to show that most media reporting is full of crud!! I formed an opinion based on the details provided that these guys screwed up. Now I think these two are heros (crazy car guy defender did not have a chl but still) and I am glad that they were able to use their rights to protect themselves.

Now the problem: we are a group of concerned citizens that care to follow up, the rest of the populace only remembers what the original stories implied. So the opinion the other readers is probably that these guys (the no billed shooters) were the bad guys.

I don't know how besides bringing it up in conversation with people you know (grassroots) to fix this oversight on the media. Will they follow up and print an update, it depends on if its a nonbiased news source. Its always bigger headlines to report rougue shooters than to say man was no billed for legally shooting in self defense.

/rant off

So the guy was a CHL? not good.