So plain English doesn't mean what it says, and you can go to jail for what they meant, not what they wrote?Charles L. Cotton wrote:Rick:
Thanks, now I understand. I have to confess that I've been so busy lately I haven't been able to follow the other thread very well.
I think the folks mean that 46.16(b)(6) exempts CHL's only from the prohibition on carrying handguns, not the other weapons set out in 46.02. According to the express language of 46.15(b)(6), a CHL carrying a handgun would also be able to carry the other weapons listed in 46.02. However, this was not legislative intent and it would be relatively easy for a prosecutor to get the tapes of the hearings and floor debate and prove that the scope of 46.16(b)(6) is limited to handguns.
Regards,
Chas.
And people wonder why some people want to see lawyer hanging as an Olympic Sport. (Present company excluded)