TexasCHLforum.com

AEA wrote:

Sorry. I'm done. Just couldn't let a clearly false statement purportedly grounded in fact to go without comment. Back to your regularly scheduled thread.

loadedliberal wrote:

SQLGeek wrote:

loadedliberal wrote: First of all the black panthers case was dismissed by the bush

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=eric+holder+black+ ... timidation" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

More specifically

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142 ... 58430.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Fine all holder did was drop the civil case after the Bush DOJ dropped the criminal case.

You are spinning like a top right now. The Bush DOJ chose to pursue civil charges as opposed to criminal charges. My guess is that because civil cases require a lower burden of proof which would be a tactical decision.

"All Holder did"? He flushed the whole case which many in the DOJ felt would have been an easy victory. That doesn't bother you or did it only bother you when you thought it was all Bush's fault?

loadedliberal wrote: First of all the black panthers case was dismissed by the bush

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=eric+holder+black+ ... timidation" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

More specifically

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142 ... 58430.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Done.