TexasCHLforum.com

Taypo wrote:

LDB415 wrote:You have to wonder just a bit about people worrying over someone wearing Tucker leather. How many street scum wear a full Tucker rig or similar open carrying?

How many people that are scared of guns AND capable of recognizing Tucker's work do you think there are?

My takeaway for this entire thread is.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Who is Tucker leather?
And now that I looked, I need another holster... and that my friends is YOUR fault

Jim Beaux wrote: I dont appreciate your condescension, & your assumptions are baseless in regards to what I understand.

To each his own, I have an opinion about your position, I supported mine and I stand by it.

You can disagree with mine, as i do with yours.
I do so without malice or personal attack to the person, but disagreement with the opinion.
My opinion stated as my own is just that, a personal opinion. I neither intended, nor imply, nor desire anything negative to you as a person.

Jim Beaux wrote:I have a problem here.

Im not a fan of OC & dont plan to ever OC - but the reality is Whataburger is infringing on 2A rights - and some here are ok with it cuz it doesnt directly affect them....AT THIS TIME...

"Then they came for me"

You may have a problem, but I see it as your understanding of the 2nd amendment and property rights. ...not the stance of a burger joint.

You have a right to own a weapon, and if licensed carry it concealed.. you have NO right to a mediocre burger .. so feel free to carry your weapon .. you can carry it at home on your property, and in many public places, and on others private property unless they inform you otherwise. But the same as you can tell someone to stay off your property, others, even burger joint owners can tell you to stay off thiers.
Personally I would want it no other way.

I never have understood how some 2nd amendment supporters can fail to understand property rights