TexasCHLforum.com

jocat54 wrote:
Not to start any argruements--but if I have to pull a weapon and fire it--it will not be to wound someone and it probably won't be one shot.

No argument, but I do think you missed the intent.

“Stopping the threat” does not equal warning shots or “wounding shots” whatever the heck that might mean..

Use of your concealed Hand gun = decision to use deadly force.
Use of deadly force = being deadly, until the threat is stopped. If that point in time coincides with the death of the attacker, that is ok, if he is simply laying there bleeding heavily from non mortal wounds, but is incapacitated, then that also is a successful outcome to your decision to use deadly force in your self defense in order to “Stop the Threat”

Pug wrote:

bronco78 wrote:

GlockFan wrote:

mojo84 wrote:I bet once you shoot one or two of them, the rest will scatter like rats. Thanks for making me spray coffee all over my laptop.

History shows it does not work that way. You get a few seconds while they duck the first time, and you better take advantage.. after that the MOB moves, and if a few more fall, the rest will MOB along. So Shoot a few, and RUN……., round a corner, wait.. Shoot a few more AND RUN, repeat until your clear or out of ammo, then RUN

Reminds me of the last time I got caught in a zombie attack...used very the same tactic!

The difference is, Ive used my tactics in real life

GlockFan wrote:

mojo84 wrote:I bet once you shoot one or two of them, the rest will scatter like rats.
Thanks for making me spray coffee all over my laptop.

History shows it does not work that way.
You get a few seconds while they duck the first time, and you better take advantage.. after that the MOB moves, and if a few more fall, the rest will MOB along.
So Shoot a few, and RUN……., round a corner, wait.. Shoot a few more AND RUN, repeat until your clear or out of ammo, then RUN