Search found 3 matches

by G26ster
Thu Mar 31, 2016 10:21 am
Forum: Off-Topic
Topic: It's finally been settled!
Replies: 83
Views: 10517

Re: It's finally been settled!

flintknapper wrote: When I was in college I had a '69 XKE Roadster, 4.2 six with Dual Strombergs. Really enjoyed that vehicle for all the reasons listed above, but it was not a particularly reliable car and required an incredible amount of maintenance. But....lord was it worth it!
Bet you wish you still had it, with the prices of some "early" E-Types hitting 300k. :shock:

I've owned 3 Jaguars with the 4.2 inline 6 engine (Series III) and one with the V12 (Canadian Series III), but all were fortunately fuel injected. I've driven 2 of them on 3000 mile trips without a hiccup, and 2 were "daily drivers" for my wife and I for about 10 years with only routine maintenance. Older Jag maintenance is not that hard, and not that expensive (except for the inboard rear brake drums on some models which require the axles to be pulled), especially when compared to today's cars where simple parts and computer boxes can cost thousands to replace. I currently own a 1953 MGTD, which requires constant maintenance, but that was true even when the car was brand new. And yes, all had/have a bonnet, boot, wings, windscreens, headlamps, tyres, petrol tanks, and many many spanners were used to keep things right (MG has a "hood" = convertible top). But do it right, and "Bob's your uncle," you're done (except for the "fiddely bits"). :mrgreen:
by G26ster
Wed Mar 30, 2016 4:57 pm
Forum: Off-Topic
Topic: It's finally been settled!
Replies: 83
Views: 10517

Re: It's finally been settled!

VoiceofReason wrote:
They must have had something going for them, they were used in WWII, Korea, and Viet Nam. Sounds like someone in R&D was getting a little money to trash the 1911.
True, as the M1 Carbine never did replace the 1911. I was pointing out the research done on casualties from German records. Same would probably be true for any hand gun.

I carried a 1911 in Korea ('64-'65) in the mechanized infantry. Never fired it in anger, so to speak, but it was a lot lighter than the M1/M14 I humped all over the mountains in Korea my previous tour as a non-mechanized grunt :lol:
by G26ster
Wed Mar 30, 2016 4:32 pm
Forum: Off-Topic
Topic: It's finally been settled!
Replies: 83
Views: 10517

Re: It's finally been settled!

Whenever the 1911 vs. Glock discussions re-appear, I'm always reminded of the following quote from the book "War Baby":

"When in 1941, the Army was looking to replace the M1911 pistol with the M1 Carbine, speaking of the pistol, the ARMY R&D published the following, “This weapon (the M1911) was primarily for defensive purposes since its effective range is limited to not more than 25 yards, except when handled by an expert. Its ineffectiveness was well proven by the amazingly small number of casualties it inflicted upon enemy troops during WWI as revealed by post-war inspection of German casualty lists and hospital records.”

Also, I have to wonder how many defenders of either the 1911, or the Glock (and I own both), have ever actually had to use one in a real life self defense situation to really know with certainty just how well they will perform (the gun and themselves).

Return to “It's finally been settled!”