They're actually MORE mil-spec than aluminum lowers, in fact. That's why you'll find that the mating between the upper and lower on a New Frontier Armory lower is extremely snug with no "slop".baldeagle wrote:The polys are milspec.RECIT wrote:The cav-arms lowers have been around for years. I personally like them and have handled a rifle that used one. I thought the rifle was a little front heavy or unbalanced, but not bad. Honestly that would be nit picking. I like the fixed stock as well. The complete NFA lowers I have seen had an adjustable stock. The cav-arms lowers were the first to hit the market, NFA is a relatively new company but I have heard nothing but good news from them. For a plinking/fun/range type gun I would not hesitate to use either option. For a work gun I would stick to mil-spec for sure.
Search found 2 matches
Return to “Poly Lower Receivers?”
- Fri Mar 01, 2013 2:23 pm
- Forum: Rifles & Shotguns
- Topic: Poly Lower Receivers?
- Replies: 17
- Views: 2912
Re: Poly Lower Receivers?
- Thu Feb 21, 2013 5:42 am
- Forum: Rifles & Shotguns
- Topic: Poly Lower Receivers?
- Replies: 17
- Views: 2912
Re: Poly Lower Receivers?
I've sold hundreds. Never had complaints and many customers come back to buy more. That being said, there ARE differences in poly lowers. Do your research.