You can only kill someone once. The other 50 or so shots were insurance.Alric wrote:My point is, I've seen a lot of shootings I'd consider excessive force. The guy being shot at simply didn't have a chance in hell. If I empty a mag into a BG, or two mags that I'd usually carry, you know the LEOs that come to investigate the situation would raise eyebrows, and rightly so. It doesn't take 110 bullets to "stop" a threat. 110 bullets annihilates it.
And I'm not even saying that from the LEO perspective, I wouldn't have done the same thing. But thats also one of the reasons I'm not a LEO. We have a judge and jury system to determine and deal with guilt.
Search found 2 matches
Return to “Sheriff: "68/110? We ran out of ammo!"”
- Sun Oct 01, 2006 3:00 pm
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: Sheriff: "68/110? We ran out of ammo!"
- Replies: 32
- Views: 5915
- Sun Oct 01, 2006 9:51 am
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: Sheriff: "68/110? We ran out of ammo!"
- Replies: 32
- Views: 5915
Why change the facts to get a reaction? He didn't do what "wrongly accused" people do. If I was wrongly accused, I wouldn't be hiding in the woods with the dead Deputy's pistol. He was, and now he's dead. Good.Alric wrote:Lets change the situation a little.
Lets say you have been accused, wrongly, of killing a Law enforcement officer.
Now how would you feel about this type of justice?