The SA-NSA distinction is a holdover from the way that security guards are licensed. They have to qualify with each type of weapon that they want to use.
It's pointless. No other state has such a requirement (though some require you to qualify with the exact handgun that you're going to carry).
- Jim
Search found 3 matches
Return to “"Modified" Pistol for CHL Class”
- Fri Apr 16, 2010 4:10 pm
- Forum: New to CHL?
- Topic: "Modified" Pistol for CHL Class
- Replies: 25
- Views: 3234
- Thu Apr 15, 2010 6:51 pm
- Forum: New to CHL?
- Topic: "Modified" Pistol for CHL Class
- Replies: 25
- Views: 3234
Re: "Modified" Pistol for CHL Class
The more I think about this nonsense, the stupider it gets. Would they prohibit non-factory sights? magazines? grips? Duracoat?
- Jim
- Jim
- Wed Apr 14, 2010 4:46 pm
- Forum: New to CHL?
- Topic: "Modified" Pistol for CHL Class
- Replies: 25
- Views: 3234
Re: "Modified" Pistol for CHL Class
Welcome to the forum.
It's not a legal requirement. The only legal requirement is to use a semi-auto of .32 caliber or higher, which you can find in Government Code 411.188.
The instructor or range can add requirements, I suppose. The law does not prohibit them from doing so.
You can borrow a pistol that he is comfortable with or find an instructor who doesn't need a dose of Ex-Lax.
- Jim
[Edited to correct typo in statute citation]
It's not a legal requirement. The only legal requirement is to use a semi-auto of .32 caliber or higher, which you can find in Government Code 411.188.
The instructor or range can add requirements, I suppose. The law does not prohibit them from doing so.
You can borrow a pistol that he is comfortable with or find an instructor who doesn't need a dose of Ex-Lax.
- Jim
[Edited to correct typo in statute citation]