Oldgringo wrote:Beiruty wrote:
Finally, why this shooter is not called a terrorist, or the incident as a terroristic act by an Anti-government agent is just mind boggling
The accused, or someone, certainly did engage in a most despicable and cowardly act of murderous terror against an unarmed and unsuspecting group of innocents. It is yet to be determined if the accused is a member of, or otherwise associated with, a larger group of like-minded cowardly assassins. I don't know if this answers your question, but it is a start.
His motive seems to be personal (frustration, humiliation, revenge, etc.), and not targeted to using terror for political ends. Thus, not a "terrorist." Just massively criminal. Of course, I see true terrorism as criminal, no matter how you look at it....
