And Pearland Bass Pro; only bought one rifle there last year, none since.Mike1951 wrote:If it hasn't been mentioned, WalMart is another store that requires a manager to carry your already paid for firearm until outside the store.
Search found 3 matches
Return to “BAD gun buying experience”
- Mon Jul 12, 2010 10:51 pm
- Forum: Never Again!!
- Topic: BAD gun buying experience
- Replies: 92
- Views: 13825
Re: BAD gun buying experience
- Sun Jul 11, 2010 7:21 pm
- Forum: Never Again!!
- Topic: BAD gun buying experience
- Replies: 92
- Views: 13825
Re: BAD gun buying experience
Yes, I stand by what I said. Unfortunately, I disagree with essentially everything you've said here. Please don't believe everything/most things you read on the Internet.Pinkycatcher wrote:OldSchool wrote:
Snip
Please, let's let this thread go back to the OP.
- Sun Jul 11, 2010 12:44 pm
- Forum: Never Again!!
- Topic: BAD gun buying experience
- Replies: 92
- Views: 13825
Re: BAD gun buying experience
Whenever I feel nervous making a purchase, I tell them quite firmly to cancel the purchase, and give me back my paperwork and ID now. This is my money, not theirs, and I have already been cleared as a gun buyer. When DynaBlue bought a Henry at the Pearland Academy a couple months back, there was none of this going on. We almost bought at the LC Academy a couple weeks ago, but they informed us that the upcoming sale would be better (it wasn't, so we didn't). I doubt I'll be going to the TC Academy anytime.seniorshooteress wrote:...I was just really nervouse cause even after they had written down my license #'s they didn't hand me back my ID til I was ready to take my register walk. The guy said "I have them in my pocket they aren't going anywhere."... AFTER thought. This is the first time I have ever been asked WHY are you buying a gun>
There, fixed it for you.Pinkycatcher wrote:Oldgringo wrote: Wow do you have nostalgia goggles now, and I fixed that list for you, we had all the other things, or we don't have them now (no man has stepped on the moon in decades) and I can name a thousand things that are objectively better now than them including but not limited to:
Advances in medicine--more expensive.
The Internet allowing free and massive access to MIS-information
More expensive, less efficient, and unfixable vehicles
More expensive, less efficient and unfixable TV's
Cheaper and less durable construction
More expensive and less efficient everything basically
Personal computers (really? you put this as a bad thing?)
More fake knowledge in every field
Contacts--you're saying we didn't have these in the 60's?
Running bad water in more expensive homes
etc. etc.
I can go on, but are we better now? Objectively most likely, subjectively not to you with your goggles on, but yes to me.
No, we're not better off just because of gadgets that someone on the TV says we need to buy.
</thread hijack>