Search found 5 matches

by sjfcontrol
Mon Jun 30, 2014 8:38 pm
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: Sign at entrance to property (not door)
Replies: 88
Views: 16040

Re: Sign at entrance to property (not door)

Pawpaw wrote:
nightmare wrote:Where does the trespass law say it doesn't apply to vehicles?
It doesn't, however PC §46.02 makes it legal for anyone to keep a firearm in their vehicle, whether they have a CHL or not.

Charles has said many times that it was never the legislature's intent that obtaining a CHL would cause you to lose any other protections of the law.
And yet you obviously do, since you have to display your license when carrying and asked for ID while in a car, but don't if you're carrying unlicensed and in a car.
by sjfcontrol
Thu May 22, 2014 3:29 pm
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: Sign at entrance to property (not door)
Replies: 88
Views: 16040

Re: Sign at entrance to property (not door)

ScottDLS wrote:
sjfcontrol wrote:Scott -- better re-read 30.06. There is no mention of premises, it's "property".
True, however when I re-read 30.06
... 1) carries a handgun under the authority of Subchapter H, Chapter 411, Government Code, on property of another without effective consent;...
If you keep gun you're car, you are not carrying "under the authority" of CHL, but you still are covered by MPA... And the 30.05 DEFENSE to prosecution still doesn't go away as long as you HAVE a CHL.
OK, that is a different argument than you were making earlier. My statement was only regarding your 30.06/premises statement.
by sjfcontrol
Thu May 22, 2014 2:57 pm
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: Sign at entrance to property (not door)
Replies: 88
Views: 16040

Re: Sign at entrance to property (not door)

Scott -- better re-read 30.06. There is no mention of premises, it's "property".
by sjfcontrol
Tue May 20, 2014 8:53 pm
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: Sign at entrance to property (not door)
Replies: 88
Views: 16040

Re: Sign at entrance to property (not door)

Keith B wrote:
jimlongley wrote:.....DPS considers the effort to post 30.06 to be an indication of intent.....
I totally agree that any no gun sign posted, 30.06 or otherwise, shows their intent to prevent guns in their business. HOWEVER, the law has specific requirements for the sign or other legal notification. So, while they may have intended to prevent me from carrying, since they failed to meet the legal guidelines I can legally carry there. It's no different from me; I intend to do a lot of things, but fail to properly carry through with a lot of them. ;-)
Don't give me a ticket, officer. I intended to stop at the red light.
I intended to stay under 60 MPH.

Or, with this administration, I intended to pay my taxes. (Oh, wait, that worked.)

Return to “Sign at entrance to property (not door)”