TAM -- I sure wish I had as much faith in the Obama-supporters sense of logic. However, this question WAS settled in 2008 -- and against what you are arguing. Remember, the left claimed Sarah Palin was unqualified because of "lack of experience". Even though she had FAR more experience than Obama, who had never run anything.The Annoyed Man wrote: But even if he did run today, his relative inexperience would not be a detraction, given that the "loyal opposition" put that argument to rest back in 2008. I would LOVE to throw that back in an Obama supporter's face if given the chance. Why? Because they either have to agree that there's nothing wrong with Rubio's relative lack of experience, or they have to admit that they were wrong about Obama's lack of experience. If they agree that experience is unimportant, then that's one less stone they could throw at a Rubio candidacy. If they admit that they were wrong, then they have to either, in good conscience vote for anybody besides Obama, or they have to admit that they are not people of good conscience.
Search found 2 matches
Return to “correct me if Im wrong...”
- Mon Aug 01, 2011 12:00 pm
- Forum: Off-Topic
- Topic: correct me if Im wrong...
- Replies: 73
- Views: 7041
Re: correct me if Im wrong...
- Thu Jul 28, 2011 12:05 pm
- Forum: Off-Topic
- Topic: correct me if Im wrong...
- Replies: 73
- Views: 7041
Re: correct me if Im wrong...
Funny, all I've seen Obama do is whine and scream (on TV, even), and threaten veto if he doesn't get what he wants. I've seen NO plans from him. I have seen plans from the house republicans, which the Senate claims is DOA, and Obama says he'll veto. I don't see the GOP saying no, I see the Demo's saying no.loadedliberal wrote: Obama has bent over backwards to get a deal done and all the GOP has done is throw a fit, whine and scream no.