I am continually amazed at the shallowness of most (all?) liberal thinking.mr surveyor wrote: I am amazed that there are still American citizens theat think the UN has anything good to offer our country.
Search found 3 matches
Return to “Uh oh - the UN takes step 1 in the US...”
- Sun May 02, 2010 5:27 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Uh oh - the UN takes step 1 in the US...
- Replies: 22
- Views: 2914
Re: Uh oh - the UN takes step 1 in the US...
- Fri Apr 30, 2010 8:01 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Uh oh - the UN takes step 1 in the US...
- Replies: 22
- Views: 2914
Re: Uh oh - the UN takes step 1 in the US...
"A" single gun in a civil war, and they think it's a conspiracy? Who's wearing the tin foil hats now??? 
- Fri Apr 30, 2010 7:33 am
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Uh oh - the UN takes step 1 in the US...
- Replies: 22
- Views: 2914
Re: Uh oh - the UN takes step 1 in the US...
OK -- that is a strange request. They (the UN) requested information about a specific pistol by serial number directly from the manufacturer. They were requesting:
1) name & address of the "entity" it was sold to.
2) a list of other weapons sold in the same consignment
3) any information regarding re-sale.
H&K would probably be ABLE (but not willing) to supply information regarding the wholesale distribution process, but would have no information regarding the ultimate retail purchaser (unless the purchaser sent in a warrantee card, or something). Neither H&K or BAFTA would necessarily have any info regarding re-sale.
BAFTE, on the other hand, might know the retail purchaser, but the 4473 forms are typically kept by the FFL (not sent to BAFTE unless the FFL closes business), and the NICS records are SUPPOSED to be destroyed after a short period of time.
I'm guessing the UN was attempting to see if a batch (consignment) of handguns from H&K was redirected somehow to this "Cote d'Ivoire" group. Anyway, seems like a fishing expedition to me.
1) name & address of the "entity" it was sold to.
2) a list of other weapons sold in the same consignment
3) any information regarding re-sale.
H&K would probably be ABLE (but not willing) to supply information regarding the wholesale distribution process, but would have no information regarding the ultimate retail purchaser (unless the purchaser sent in a warrantee card, or something). Neither H&K or BAFTA would necessarily have any info regarding re-sale.
BAFTE, on the other hand, might know the retail purchaser, but the 4473 forms are typically kept by the FFL (not sent to BAFTE unless the FFL closes business), and the NICS records are SUPPOSED to be destroyed after a short period of time.
I'm guessing the UN was attempting to see if a batch (consignment) of handguns from H&K was redirected somehow to this "Cote d'Ivoire" group. Anyway, seems like a fishing expedition to me.