Search found 4 matches

by VoiceofReason
Wed Aug 06, 2014 9:15 pm
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: Cities improperly posting 30.06 signs?
Replies: 1085
Views: 367020

Re: Cities improperly posting 30.06 signs?

JKTex wrote:
VoiceofReason wrote:Submitted with no comment. Request your opinion.
2014-08-04_13-00-37_695 - Copy.jpg
2014-08-04 Water district 2.jpg
My opinion is that you posted a picture of some signs. :mrgreen: They don't mean anything, but depending on where they're posted they could be a courtesy reminder.

Where are they posted?
At the County Fresh Water Supply District office (I assume county property).

We have had to go there a couple of times to pay our water bill so it wouldn’t be late
by VoiceofReason
Tue Aug 05, 2014 3:46 pm
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: Cities improperly posting 30.06 signs?
Replies: 1085
Views: 367020

Re: Cities improperly posting 30.06 signs?

Keith B wrote:
VoiceofReason wrote:Submitted with no comment. Request your opinion.
2014-08-04_13-00-37_695 - Copy.jpg
2014-08-04 Water district 2.jpg
Not valid. Doesn't even come close to trying to be a 30.06. I would personally carry right past it. And since it says concealed firearms are prohibited I might even OPEN CARRY!! :biggrinjester:
When I retired I left Houston after 20 years and moved back to South Texas. To give you an idea how small the town is that I live in, the post office just looks like a regular house. It doesn't even have a sign that says Post Office on it. Mayberry is much bigger.

Both city limit signs are on the same post. :smilelol5:
by VoiceofReason
Tue Aug 05, 2014 2:25 pm
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: Cities improperly posting 30.06 signs?
Replies: 1085
Views: 367020

Re: Cities improperly posting 30.06 signs?

Submitted with no comment. Request your opinion.
2014-08-04_13-00-37_695 - Copy.jpg
2014-08-04 Water district 2.jpg
by VoiceofReason
Thu Mar 25, 2010 3:09 pm
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: Cities improperly posting 30.06 signs?
Replies: 1085
Views: 367020

Re:

Charles L. Cotton wrote:In order to meet the requirements of 30.06, the sign must exactly meet the statutory specifications. If the sign is only in English, then it doesn't the requirements of 30.06 and should not be enforceable. Unlike civil statutes, penal statutes are interpreted far more narrowly, since life and liberty are at stake.

I am not aware of a case on this issue, but I will do some research. This is another situation where a LEO probably wouldn't make the arrest, if he/she were educated on the requirements of a 30.06 sign, and a reasonable DA would not accept charges. However, if a CHL was arrested for crossing such a sign and the DA accepted the charges, then the CHL would have to pay the tab to go to trial, and if found guilty, see if the appellate courts agree with my analysis.

As you can tell from several of my posts, I never suggest that anyone venture into uncharted waters, when it comes to testing the parameters of relatively new statutes. As a trial attorney, I love to be in court! I'll fight to the last drop of blood, but I am always aware that it's my clients' blood.

I wouldn't hesitate to cross a sign like you describe, but that's my decision, not legal advice to non-attorneys.

Regards,
Chas.
Charles,
I have been browsing this forum and I appreciate the work you have put into this and other CHL issues. :tiphat: I am sure everyone else on these boards do too. I wish there was some way I could assist. The only way CHL holders can maintain our rights is to work together as a group to fight for our rights. :patriot: :txflag:

Return to “Cities improperly posting 30.06 signs?”