You've got a good point there. Even though the Glock 19 uses 9mm which is slightly cheaper than 38 special, you're shooting less with a revolver than with a semi-auto, so you save more on ammo. Also, if this person doesn't hunt, then a .22lr revolver should be more useful for training with cheaper ammo than a .22lr rifle. I think I'll reccomend revolvers and bolt actions instead of the Glock and AR-15 for those on a budget.JSThane wrote:I'll play. Since we're saying "minimum," I'm going with fairly basic choices, no tacticoolness involved.
1. A .22 rimfire for plinking and small-game hunting. Handgun, since it's more easily stored and carried than a rifle. Revolver, for conservation of ammmunition. Choice?
Ruger Single Six.
2. A centerfire handgun for self-defense, small-to-medium-game hunting, and plinking. A revolver again, for conservation of ammunition. Choice?
Some flavor of .357 Magnum wheelgun, preferably either a used Ruger or a used Smith & Wessson.
3. A centerfire rifle for large-game hunting. Bolt-action, for simplicity and again, conservation of ammunition. Choice?
Pawn-shop .308 or .30-06, brand doesn't really matter. Usually, the store can be talked down quite a bit on the price. I chose those calibers because of the wide range of usefulness they have, plus the fairly readily available ammunition.
4. A shotgun.
Mossberg 500 in 12 gauge. 'Nuff said.
If one looks carefully, and takes one's time, you should be able to get all four for under a thousand dollars total. I'm figuring on ~$300 for each handgun, and >$200 for each long gun, on the used market. It will take some time and care to find decent firearms in each category, but it's doable.
I like the way you think,