TexasCHLforum.com

Well dang. We were all packed up to go to the range, I got 300 rounds of ammo to shoot plus a box of Zombie rounds.... and when we got to Patriot Arms they were closed for a CHL class. I guess I will have to wait until next weekend. I'm kind of grumpy about that, because it wasn't posted on their website (unless I bothered to look for CHL classes specifically). I would have appreciated a heads up so I didn't waste my time and plan my day around shooting.

I guess that's okay, I'll go next weekend.

Thanks for the input on the 938. I finally found a gun shop with one in stock, and I have to say... I much preferred the 238. It felt much better in my hand. The increased depth of the grip on the 938 was a big turn-off. With either one, I needed the extended mag in order for it to feel comfortable to grip, but that's no big deal.

You may have seen my new post about my new carry....a 238! (http://texaschlforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=58571)

I appreciate everyone's input and I am quite excited to report back on its range performance this weekend.

As siphonic said, many people have problems due to their own actions and I know that's happened to me before. Unfortunately, it seems that I cannot necessarily adapt to every gun, which is why I sold my KelTec PF9. I just couldn't handle the dang thing kicking like a mule and as a result I was flinching and my accuracy suffered. I am much happier with my S&W 60, Kahr K9, and (hopefully) the Sig P238. I find that having a metal frame improves my accuracy significantly. I guess it's just easier for me to shoot when there is more weight in my hand.

All in all, I'm very impressed with the P238 and I can carry it with almost any outfit, meaning I will carry it all the time. I've been really bad about just leaving my carry at home when I can't conceal it well, which has left me unarmed 6 out of 7 days a week. It used to be that I couldn't carry it with me for legal reasons because I was going to college, but now that I'm out there is just no excuse for not carrying all the time. I had a heart-to-heart with the hubby and we decided that I needed to get a smaller pistol. I've always been reluctant to get anything small because I like the heavier guns, but I had to be realistic. The Kahr is nice to shoot and feels good in my hands, but it's a pain to conceal. With the P238 I feel like I didn't even have to compromise.

Thanks for the additional feedback, y'all. My hubby and I have both been seeing the same complaints pop up about the 938, so I'm slightly hesitant to get one. I may just bite it and get the 238 even though it's a .380. We'll see. The P238 Desert does look pretty awesome, I have to say...!

baldeagle - Doesn't matter if it's discontinued, I'm not necessarily looking for a gun I can order from a dealer right this very minute. If I want something I will wait to find one. In any case, I'm leaning towards the 938 so finding a 239 probably won't be an issue.

OverEasy - I prefer to steer clear of polymer-framed guns when they're smaller than my Kahr. I haven't liked any of the ones I've shot, and the one that I owned, I sold. I like the Sig and the Colt Pony because they're metal. The Sig wins because the sights are fantastic and it fits so nicely in my hand. :)

WildBill - Glad to know they are reliable. Still, I think I'll ultimately go with the 938.

I think some of you are confused. It says on the Sig Arms website that the 239 SAS does have a DAK trigger. See here under the "specifications" tab: http://www.sigsauer.com/CatalogProductD ... 9-sas.aspx Upon further review, the grip size may be what eliminates the 239 SAS from the running, and it is indeed longer than my Kahr. I would need to see one in person so I can judge the size. The reason my Kahr isn't an option right now is the width and the butt of the gun; compared to the 238 and 938, it's too bulky. I've tried to waistband carry that, believe me.

Baldeagle: Yeah, maybe I need an excuse to buy a new gun. I haven't bought a new one in over a year! Hubby and I are both looking to buy pocket-carry sized guns right now. We're calling them our 5-year anniversary presents. I know the gifts for that are traditionally wood-related, but if we get wood grips it still counts, right?

Shinesintx: I suppose it wouldn't be a big deal to get a .380 calibered gun, but the way we buy ammo...yes, we would stock up with a minimum of 500 rounds. It's easier to take from our current stock of 9mm than to drop a bunch of cash on more ammo...at least, right now it is. I looked at the 238 first and then the guy at our local gun shop told us about the 239 and 938. I wouldn't be opposed to the 238, really, it's more my husband that is reluctant to change calibers. I do have to say, though, that the 938 looks real nice!

MikeStone - I used to carry a 1911 so the SA trigger and carrying cocked and locked doesn't bother me. My only concern is that the safety is so small and, judging by the similar 238 I handled, very tight and hard to disengage compared to a 1911. Size of that thumb safety makes a difference for sure. If I get one, maybe I could have someone do some work on it to make disengaging it smoother. Glad to hear that it functioned well out of the gate - makes me more confident about buying a new model!

At this point I'm leaning towards the 938, especially having reviewed the specs.

My husband jokes that I have expensive taste. When I went revolver shopping I insisted on the SW, which was $200 more than any comparable revolver was at the time. This time I was looking at a Colt Pony, Sig 238, or a Diamondback. I decided on the Sig which is also about $200 more than the others. Now I'm just deciding between Sigs. Better start putting some more cash in my piggy bank to fund this!

Thanks for the feedback, everyone! If anyone else wants to throw in their 2 cents, I'd appreciate it!

I have recently accepted an internship at an office that requires a different sort of attire than I am accustomed to wearing. Instead of jeans and a vest I will be required to wear nice slacks and a blouse. Obviously that is a bit of a problem when my current carry only works with a cover garment like a vest. It's hard to conceal a Smith 60 or Kahr K9 in my waistband when I'm a tiny woman and every waistline bulge looks like an advanced tumor or, well, a gun.

I've done some shopping and research and have narrowed down my new carry option to the Sig P239 SAS or the Sig P938. I can conceal it in my waistband and the thin profile doesn't draw attention to my gun bulge. They are both also 9mm (yes, the 239 is not a typo for 238) so that suits me fine. I didn't want to add another caliber to our list of ammo we need to keep on hand - being able to load multiple weapons with the same caliber is a benefit when it comes to shooting on a budget.

So, my question is: does anyone have experience with either model? The DAK trigger on the 239 is appealing to me. I know the 938 is new so they are still working out the kinks. I do prefer the thumb safety on the 938 to the 239, but I suppose it doesn't matter as long as I practice disengaging the safety so it becomes part of my muscle memory. They are similar enough in size that it's not really an issue. I am interested in how reliable the models are. I would also be interested to hear of any other factors I may have overlooked; someone who owns and shoots the gun would be a great resource for considering things I cannot because I have not shot either one. Then again, the 938 is new enough that you might not have shot one either!

Edited to add: If anyone owns either of these guns and lives in the Lubbock area (or will be visiting soon), I would buy you dinner for the opportunity to shoot one!

9/17 - Edited again to add: This is 239 SAS I'm talking about: http://www.sigsauer.com/CatalogProductD ... 9-sas.aspx. The dimensions are a little larger than the 938, but since the width is what I'm most concerned about and there is only .1" difference, it's not that big of a deal. The length is only about a half-inch difference, too.