TexasCHLforum.com

philip964

sjfcontrol wrote:
ScottDLS wrote:
philip964 wrote:http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2014/09 ... hing-less/

Big march brings out the cooks.
I prefer to call them "chefs".
I figured they were planning a BBQ.

Cooks haha, kooks

philip964

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2014/09 ... hing-less/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Big march brings out the cooks.

philip964

K.Mooneyham wrote:Since this is a gun forum, something gun related should be said on this topic. The type of people who want to jam humanity into a few mega cities aren't going to be too fond of the shooting sports, nor of self-defense by the average citizen. So, when I vote against global warming zealots, and environmentalist control types, I feel that I'm also protecting firearms rights in a roundabout way.

The firing of a gun could be made illegal as it produces carbon dioxide. Nothing in the second amendment about firing a gun.

Don't think they arnt thinking about it

philip964

I am what I think in the most polite liberal terms that is used to describe me is a "skeptic".

That said, I believe the English proverb is "Waste not, want not".

Conservation and recycling are good things.

We just should not worry about carbon dioxide. It is not a pollutant. Sorry Supreme Court, you are idiots.

If you disagree with me. Please take the following test.

What part of the atmosphere is Carbon dioxide.

a. More than 10%

b. More than 5% but less than 10%

c. More than .05% but less than 5%

d. Less than .05%

philip964

cb1000rider wrote:It's interesting to me to see that people don't believe the climate is changing. I'm going to ignore all the drible about reducing the human population, it's just distracting.

The vast majority of the scientific community believes that the climate is changing (warming). I find it "interesting" to see that many conservatives don't accept it.. And there are liberals too (VM: Progressives) - but I think that denying it at this point is simply sticking your head in the sand.

The question is - how much of it is due to humans and how much of it is something else... I think that's still up for debate, but certainly "we" aren't helping the situation.

How much does the climate need to change before people start to think that it might be a real thing? However much that is, I hope it's not too much...

The climate on Earth has changed since the beginning of time. Global warming is actually a good thing. Global cooling is a bad thing, that is, unless your not a fan of the current mix of organisms that inhabit the Earth.

philip964

http://news.yahoo.com/study-links-polar ... 24533.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

As the Earth warms North America could see colder weather.

Someone please tell me when it is laughable. Are we there yet?

philip964

I have a test.

Guess the percentage of CO2 in the atmosphere.

Now look it up and see how close you got. Wikipedia is a reasonable place unless you think "they have been gotten too"

If you ever meet a "humanity is responsible for climate change" type of person.

Give them the same test. Don't tell, them make them look it up.

Whoa don't confuse me with the facts.

TexasCHLforum.com

Search found 7 matches

Re: 'If you don't believe in climate change you must be sick

Re: 'If you don't believe in climate change you must be sick

Re: 'If you don't believe in climate change you must be sick

Re: 'If you don't believe in climate change you must be sick

Re: 'If you don't believe in climate change you must be sick

Re: 'If you don't believe in climate change you must be sick

Re: 'If you don't believe in climate change you must be sick