It already takes more like months, friends husband took 3 months getting his back after he dispatched one of a group of three would be burglars in his back yard. They were trying to find an unlocked window he shot one and the other two ran off.The Annoyed Man wrote:I had the same thought.v-rog wrote:I'm interested in seeing the "list" regarding EO #4Who gets to decide what "dangerous" means? Are you dangerous if you call AR15s and AK47s "Militia Rifles" as I have been doing?4. Direct the Attorney General to review categories of individuals prohibited from having a gun to make sure dangerous people are not slipping through the cracks.
5. Propose rulemaking to give law enforcement the ability to run a full background check on an individual before returning a seized gun.
I'd like to know how #5 would affect a CHL holder whose gun has been seized pending the outcome of a self-defense shooting........or even a non-CHL but lawful gun owner. He had the background check when he bought the gun. He broke no laws between then and when he uses it in self-defense, and his self-defense was lawful, but he has to have another background check which can take weeks before he has his gun returned to him? And what if he owns more than one gun? Do they seize all his other guns pending a background check?
Sieg Heil, Mr. President.
And # 4 shall apply to all members of the following: those who did not support BO at a level above the legal campaign limits, especially those Tea Party types wit a Libertarian leaning.