And I can't do anything about the potential dangers of a place that invites the general public when doing a constitutionally legal act necessary for self preservation. Sounds a little like the beast feeding in public argument to me. Guns are for self defense. It is legal for me to carry a gun. There is inherent danger in visiting a place that exchanges goods and services for cash and invites the public.Winchster wrote:Not exactly, a person cannot do anything about the color of their skin and neither can the handicapped do anything about their condition. We, on the other hand, have a choice regarding ours.Embalmo wrote:Based on that logic, minorities and the handicapped have the right to choose not to shop in a place where there are anti signs posted. I see it as a safety issue. I consider my daily carry the same as any other tool that maintains my health and safety like my asthma rescue inhaler.
M. Ball Moe
Search found 2 matches
- Sat Feb 14, 2015 9:00 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Rethinking 30.06
- Replies: 106
- Views: 13188
Re: Rethinking 30.06
- Sat Feb 14, 2015 5:38 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Rethinking 30.06
- Replies: 106
- Views: 13188
Re: Rethinking 30.06
Based on that logic, minorities and the handicapped have the right to choose not to shop in a place where there are anti signs posted. I see it as a safety issue. I consider my daily carry the same as any other tool that maintains my health and safety like my asthma rescue inhaler.
M. Ball Moe
M. Ball Moe