Exactly. They have no idea of what happened , but the MO is to immediately embed the idea that someone erred. I pray this does not portend an outbreak here.The Annoyed Man wrote:They're saying it was a breach of protocol, but they're not identifying the breach........which means that they really don't know what happened. They have a model. If the disease is cooperative with their model, then they feel safe. If the disease doesn't cooperate, then their assumption is that the protocol was violated, because their model just couldn't be wrong........ sort of like climate alarmist beliefs in models which nature refuses to bow down to.puma guy wrote:A nurse who cared for Mr. Duncan has tested positive for Ebola. The CDC is already spinning it as a "breach of protocol" but other reports state investigation is ongoing. Some of the links have some advertising and links that I didn't want to post so I'll leave it to the reader to look up info on the situatuon. Bottom line there's no telling how many were exposed by this second person. and so it goes.
Maybe there was a breach of protocol, maybe there wasn't. But since they themselves admit that they don't know exactly what happened, it's a little dishonest to label it the way they have without knowing.
Search found 2 matches
Return to “Ebola outbreak in Africa”
- Sun Oct 12, 2014 3:22 pm
- Forum: Off-Topic
- Topic: Ebola outbreak in Africa
- Replies: 364
- Views: 54929
Re: Ebola outbreak in Africa
- Sun Oct 12, 2014 2:19 pm
- Forum: Off-Topic
- Topic: Ebola outbreak in Africa
- Replies: 364
- Views: 54929
Re: Ebola outbreak in Africa
A nurse who cared for Mr. Duncan has tested positive for Ebola. The CDC is already spinning it as a "breach of protocol" but other reports state investigation is ongoing. Some of the links have some advertising and links that I didn't want to post so I'll leave it to the reader to look up info on the situatuon. Bottom line there's no telling how many were exposed by this second person. and so it goes.