TexasCHLforum.com

ScottDLS wrote:

C-dub wrote:

TBJK wrote:Lol. Wouldn't seem to be legal but don't know if I'll test that one. It wouldn't seem to be an entrance if you enter the building then see it after you have already entered. Don't believe I will shop there anymore.

Keep in mind that a proper 30.06 sign does not have to be posted at an entrance. It's nice if it posted where it can be seen prior to entering, but it doesn't have to be.

However, if you don't see the sign because of where it's posted, you are (arguably) not in violation of 30.06 as you did not "receive" notice.

It is arguable, but it also has not been tested yet either.

TBJK wrote:Lol. Wouldn't seem to be legal but don't know if I'll test that one. It wouldn't seem to be an entrance if you enter the building then see it after you have already entered. Don't believe I will shop there anymore.

Keep in mind that a proper 30.06 sign does not have to be posted at an entrance. It's nice if it posted where it can be seen prior to entering, but it doesn't have to be.

TBJK wrote:I dunno if Frisco has one yet. They didn't as of a couple months ago.

Huh.

I thought I saw one there a few years ago, the one and only time I went in there after having to take the walk of disappointment back to the truck to disarm.

Scott B. wrote: It's compliant from the other approach, isn't a that a fun a feeling?

I don't think I've ever seen anyone type Italian in English before.

I'm not too concerned about a non-compliant sign unless the business tries to enforce it and the police department also tries to enforce it. Then I think there should be some penalty for doing that and costing an innocent person to pay to remain out of jail for not committing a crime.

If you were forced into one, how did you manage to escape without surrendering any $$?