So do we.Blue Demon wrote:They provide advice and answer any questions 24 hours a day.steveincowtown wrote:Unless you know of some service I am not aware, all the ones I have seen in Texas protect ONLY against "use of force" incidents, not LEO's ignorance of the law.Blue Demon wrote:I am a member of [a prepaid legal service] and would have called them immediately.
[Moderator edit.]
Being an LEO is just like any other profession. If you don't take the time and effort to truly "learn your craft" your knowledge of codes and laws will fade very quickly.
Search found 5 matches
Return to “Police take Levelland Man's CHL - Closure UPDATE 8/28/15”
- Mon Oct 20, 2014 6:04 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Police take Levelland Man's CHL - Closure UPDATE 8/28/15
- Replies: 83
- Views: 16964
Re: Police take Levelland Man's CHL - Improper sign
- Mon Oct 06, 2014 6:52 am
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Police take Levelland Man's CHL - Closure UPDATE 8/28/15
- Replies: 83
- Views: 16964
Re: Police take Levelland Man's CHL - Improper sign
Getting a little touchy? If you say there can be two sides as you said to Jim Beaux, it sure doesn't seem like that here. I'm not telling you that my opinion is correct and yours is wrong. I'm asking you what is wrong with mine, but instead you come back with this arrogant condescending attitude.EEllis wrote:Whatever. Good luck on making a theft case.C-dub wrote: I would lean toward the abuse of power angle. Theft doesn't half to be for personal use or resale. If it were taken unlawfully, isn't that theft? How would the license itself be evidence? Wouldn't that be the gun in this case, which they let him keep?
- Sun Oct 05, 2014 9:09 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Police take Levelland Man's CHL - Closure UPDATE 8/28/15
- Replies: 83
- Views: 16964
Re: Police take Levelland Man's CHL - Improper sign
I would lean toward the abuse of power angle. Theft doesn't half to be for personal use or resale. If it were taken unlawfully, isn't that theft? How would the license itself be evidence? Wouldn't that be the gun in this case, which they let him keep?EEllis wrote:That could lead to being arrested for filing a false police report. Unless the officers took the ID for their own use, resale, etc, it would not be theft. In this situation they , wrongly in my opinion, believed the man had committed a crime. They seized his CHL as evidence they believed pertained to that crime. The worst thing that happened is that at a later point the DA, detectives, or whoever, decide that they don't believe there was a crime and release the ID because then it's no longer evidence. That isn't theft. Now if these officers said they were taking the CHL for some other reason or if they said it was because he couldn't be trusted or whatever then it could become a whole abuse of powers thing. If the cops know, and we are talking about being told by the DA or their boss or having tried and failed to be able to prosecute multiple times not "internet" knowing, that there is no possible case then there would also be an issue. We have absolutely no evidence presented that anything like that occurred so ......gringo pistolero wrote:That would be great!C-dub wrote:What if he called DPS and reported it stolen?
- Fri Oct 03, 2014 7:47 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Police take Levelland Man's CHL - Closure UPDATE 8/28/15
- Replies: 83
- Views: 16964
Re: Police take Levelland Man's CHL - Improper sign
What if he called DPS and reported it stolen?
- Wed Oct 01, 2014 1:15 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Police take Levelland Man's CHL - Closure UPDATE 8/28/15
- Replies: 83
- Views: 16964
Re: Police take Levelland Man's CHL - Improper sign
Nah, it's just a tiny little white gunbuster with the words "HAND GUNS PROHIBITED" also in white on a glass surface.Cedar Park Dad wrote: I'm assuming its a valid 30.06 sign