I wouldn't take it personally. There will be people you can explain things to until you're blue in the face and they still won't get it. And then there will be others that get it, but don't want to take the chance. That's their choice.frogbones wrote: His defenition of premises is school property when I asked what he ment about premises....I just walked away. I later approach the coach and said no disrespect to the SRO but he is incorrect about CHL and the law, I mention he read the section mention schools in the law. He said in a blow off tone, the handbook say I can't either so I guess that's trumps it all.....again I said incorrect..... handbook clearly states "I cannot carry on school premises (building ,or portion of building)". Again I stressed he read the statues regarding CHL, the Hanbook regaurding Firearms, and pointed him to this sight for more information on anything guns or CHL......he just blew me off.
Search found 2 matches
Return to “Plano School District has 30.06 posted parking lots”
- Tue Oct 18, 2011 7:21 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Plano School District has 30.06 posted parking lots
- Replies: 103
- Views: 17498
Re: Plano School District has 30.06 posted parking lots
- Tue Oct 11, 2011 5:43 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Plano School District has 30.06 posted parking lots
- Replies: 103
- Views: 17498
Re: Plano School District has 30.06 posted parking lots
That all may be true and I can't really dispute it, but there is one small example from Topeka, KS. A couple of years ago they voted to strike an entire section of their city ordinances and accidentally struck the subsection that made carrying a handgun openly illegal. Some sharp citizen noticed that and decided to OC, while walking their dog or something, and got arrested. They later found out they had nothing to charge them with and were justFedaykin wrote:Yes, sorry about that post. I was ignorant of the way the rest of the statue was written. It is much more difficult to 'erase' a statute for legislators than it is to amend it. Rather than elminating a law, they write a new law that makes the previous one obsolete. It USED to be illegal to carry in a church. Rather than erase the law, they just added a statement about it having to be posted with a 30.06 sign.
A great example of this is in the Amendments to the Constitution of the United States:
The 18th Amendment abolished Liqour.
The 21st Amendment repealed the 18th Amendment.
The 18th Amendment cannot be 'erased', it's a law. There's just a new law that repeals it.
(This is why lawyers make so much dang money interpreting all of this junk).
over what to do. Making OC illegal again came up for a vote sometime later in another city counsel meeting and it failed. In Kansas, OC is legal even without a license, but there is no state preemption. So, it is legal to OC in Topeka, Kansas, the state's capital.