I don't think you are missing a distinction. Just like I can't see the distinction between violating the tennent 2nd amendment rights and his 1st, 3rd, 4th or 5th!Dragonfighter wrote:If a hotel can't keep you from having one with you, how can a land lord? Am I missing a distinction here?
If the landlord said "No opinions other than those of the landlord allowed" the supreme court would have that struck off in a heartbeat.
If the Landlord said "Christians only'...again...outcry would ensue.
So how can they say 'No 2nd Amendment rights allowed in this building"?
