I would disagree with that to 1 point I would rather see them dead then captured, So the security I can see, but not to keep them alive only to protect national secrets, honestly I would hope an SS agent would be willing to do what is needed in the event a capture is eminent. Remember he may be the president but his life is no more or less important then yours or mine, the secrets are.mamabearCali wrote:AlphaWhiskey wrote:Don't let the pracitcality of the decision overshadow the EXTREME irony of the situation. Todays word of the day: Duplicity. Now discuss...
I agree with the decision. We do not need former presidents assassinated. Now the irony of it is very very sweet.
Search found 1 match
Return to “Obama Signs Bill Giving Him Armed Protection For Life”
- Fri Jan 11, 2013 4:47 pm
- Forum: Off-Topic
- Topic: Obama Signs Bill Giving Him Armed Protection For Life
- Replies: 18
- Views: 2676