TexasCHLforum.com

PSLOwner wrote:

marksiwel wrote:

TLE2 wrote:The saddest thing is that this is labeled "heath care" but it's insurance regulation by the feds. Nothing more.

Forcing anyone to buy is not a solution, and in my opinion will be struck down by the high court, unless the Obamanation gets to appoint some judges...

Or just elected himself czar.

So say the Supreme Court says its all good, what then?

Then if means, surprise of surprises, that talk radio performers (e.g. Rush Limbaugh, etc) are not the constitutional scholars that they think they are.

Or, God Forbid, it means that Obama has managed to stack the Court with Socialists by the time it gets there.

With some of the reforms the GOP has suggested, it would drive the cost down to where they could afford it. And the people that don't want it could remain without it and not be forced to buy insurance or pay a fine.
Their spread the wealth (Socialist) mentality won't let them do that though. They believe they must make one group pay for the other group's insurance.

Don't forget, that number of uninsured they keep throwing around includes illegal immigrants, people who just plain DON'T WANT insurance, and people who were only without insurance for 3 to 5 months and then back on.

The real number without insurance that actually want it and need it is 10 to 12 Million. or 4% tops.

(This is from the Census data that they originally used to get the numbers. The just leave out the convenient facts of what groups of people make up the numbers.)