TexasCHLforum.com

If the trajectory of the shots show that it could have been fired from the Garland range, then I think that's probably a reasonable assumption. I seriously doubt any charges would be filed in this case because it would be extremely difficult to prove who did it, even if the range had video surveillance of every shooter on the line. It could however cause some problems for the range if the city were to try and shut them down or impose stricter regulations.

If they really found a second hole in the roof, that's even more disturbing. To me, that means someone must have intentionally fired over the berm, especially with both shots landing so close together. I could believe someone might accidentally fire a round over the berm, but two in the same spot no longer seems accidental.

WFAA posted an update story tonight on the mystery bullet:

http://www.wfaa.com/news/local/Rowlett- ... 07809.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Looks like they still think it came from the Garland range.